quinta-feira, 21 de abril de 2011

O campo decepcionante das autobiografias de historiadores

Perry Andersen, a propósito da obra autobiográfica de Eric Hobsbawm, Interesting Times: A 20th-Century Life, Allen Lane, September 2002 (editada em português com o título Tempos Interessantes: Uma Vida no Século XX, Porto, Campo das Letras, 2005).

What apter practitioners of autobiography than historians? Trained to examine the past with an impartial eye, alert to oddities of context and artifices of narrative, they would appear to be the ideal candidates for the difficult task of the self-description of a life. Yet strangely it is not they but philosophers who have excelled at the genre – indeed all but invented it. In principle, autobiography is the most intimately particular of all forms of writing, philosophy the most abstract and impersonal. They should be oil and water. But it was Augustine and Rousseau who gave us the personal and sexual confession and Descartes who offered the first ‘history of my mind’: in modern times Mill and Nietzsche, Collingwood and Russell, Sartre and Quine, all left records of themselves more memorable than anything else written about them. The number of historians who have produced autobiographies of any distinction, on the other hand, is remarkably small. In the 19th century, the self-serving memoirs of Guizot and Tocqueville, rarely consulted today, are of interest mainly as testimonials of political evasion. Closer to hand, Marc Bloch’s post-mortem on 1940, with its mixture of personal report and general requisitory, is a poignant document, but too circumscribed for more than flashes of self-revelation. More recently, we have the eccentric cameos of Richard Cobb and causeries of A.J.P. Taylor, of which he said they were evidence that he had run out of historical subjects. In all, in the genre for which it seems so well designed, the craft of the historian has yielded perhaps only two classics – Gibbon’s graceful mirror at the end of the 18th century, and Henry Adams’s eerie Wunderkammer at the beginning of the 20th.

"The Age of EJH".
Texto completo na London Review of Books, Vol. 24 No. 19 · 3 October 2002, pages 3-7

1 comentário:

Rui Correia disse...

Divertidíssimo. Não me ocorrera. Mesmo aquela maré epistemologicóide da ego-história resultou num saco incauto cheio de coisa alguma.